Blowing up Bill C-4 - Letters to MPs
Definition of Trans is Imperative for Anti-Conversion Therapy Bill
I will continue this thread of articles for distribution to your Member of Parliament. Bills can be kicked back to the house by the senate for amendments so it’s important to inform your MPs about the issue.
Sadly, this afternoon the bill moved to the senate in a unanimous motion.
December 1, 2021
Everyone was so busy virtue signaling and racking up inclusion points they’re barreling towards the institutionalized mutilation of children while criminalizing dissent. All with giant smiles on their faces
Subscribe for notification of text of Daily letters to send to your MPs
Letter to MPs are free to send. My plan is to e-mail, phone AND send a letter every business day with a different look at gender conversion and bill C-4.
Please R & D from this: (Rob and Duplicate) and contact your Member of Parliament or visit them in person.
For the contact information for your Member of Parliament check: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
Dear Member of Parliament;
I am writing about significant concerns I have about the proposed Anti-Conversion bill C-4 introduced November 29 in the House of Commons.
There are five groups of your constituents who will be negatively affected by this bill.
I will address them individually in separate letters but list them here following my overview.
I will also state unequivocally, that Bill C4 will further entrench and institutionalize an egregious constellation of physical and psychological harms that thousands of vulnerable children in Canada are already being subjected to: That of being caught up in what we are now understanding in stark terms as a dangerous social contagion (Littman 2018).
As a trained researcher and professional analyst, I can provide you with a comprehensive brief on the significant problems this bill will create for Canadians and why it MUST pass before a house committee for review and revision before it is sent to the senate.
The number one reason this bill needs to modified is to adequately define what Transgender is and what it means. If parliament is planning a bill that bans conversion therapy, one must clearly define the terms. I liken this to the idea that if you want to go somewhere, you have to know where you’re coming from and what your destination is. Without knowing where we are or where we are going, we are lost.
Being Trans or being gender-non-conforming is not like being gay; nor is extending rights to Trans people the same as extending rights to Gays and Lesbians. At issue specifically here is that there are AT LEAST FOUR different types of Trans phenomenon. This is well established in medical literature.
One type of Trans phenomenon, which up until a few years ago was the most common type, is classified in psychiatry as a paraphelia, which is also known as a sexual fetish. It used to be called Transvestic Fetishism. Research shows that as many as 75% of Male to Female transitioners are heterosexual (biological Males attracted to females) who seek transition as adults (often in their 40s and even 50s) because of the growing intensity of a sexual fetish they have had since childhood - which typically began with women’s underwear and masturbation.
These trans men are known as Autogynephiles or AGPs, and they hide any criticism they might face for violating the sexual boundaries of others behind rainbow flags, while making claims and allegations of hate speech, human rights violations and transphobia.
See biological male sex offenders who self-id as trans being transferred to women’s prisons in Canada under human rights protections for LGBTQ.
Most vocal Trans Activists are this type of Trans person - and they use their minority identity and “Oppressed Status” to gain access to law makers and to influence policy to protect their interests. This can be seen in the rapidly unfolding Stonewall Scandal in the UK where Trans Activists used a well-established LGBT lobby organization to corrupt and capture public policy to their advantage while giving MPs a giant virtue-signaling opportunity for their constituents. This backfired for Stonewall, which will likely collapse, and for politicians that were witless enough to fall for this without questioning it.
To be fair, most AGP Trans Women (Bio Males) who get off acting like women are not criminals or sex offenders but the AGP phenomenon and all its variations are well established in academic studies and literature.
One must ask themselves, is it a human right for a person with a sexual fetish to have their fetish protected in the criminal code?
If we are to ban conversion therapy in law, starting points/conditions and ending points/conditions MUST be defined adequately with inputs from medical and psychiatric experts - and not just (mostly AGP trans activists)
Fortunately Canada can boast as having the world's leading professional experts in this field.
Here are five areas I will address in subsequent communication:
Bill C-4 as-is will create conflict and outrage in five groups of your constituents:
1. Parents of Gay, Lesbian and Trans Identified Children
2. LGB People, particularly Lesbians
3. Indigenous People
4. Women’s Rights Advocates and Feminists
5. Evidence-Based voters who believe in science
Call to Action:
To protect children and all of the interest groups above, Parliament must pass C-4 before a committee and amend the bill to adequately define what Transgender Identity is.
Appropriate, diverse and objective inputs from Medical and Psychiatrics experts who are NOT trans Activists.
I am a parent of Trans-Identified Natal Girl - who suffers from Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD Type Transgender Person)
Signed and Dated:
Contact Information